|
Oades, R. D., (2006).
Neurobiology and neuroimaging
studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): mechanisms
and pharmacological treatment.
Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20, A4 (S14).
Introduction: An
appreciation of the neurobiology underlying the ways in which a disorder
differs from the normal should be a preliminary to understanding and
improving on existing and helpful medication. Approaches to attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) include the techniques of neurophysiology, of
imaging the anatomical and functional correlates of the status
and function of brain regions and the effects of pharmacological
challenge.
a)
Electrophysiology and fMRI. In
resting ADHD subjects, there is usually a more or a less broad increase
of EEG slow activity in relation to fast oscillations. Studies
of the coherence between these signals
in different parts of the brain suggest that a sub-group is showing
a delay in maturation of the underlying neural structures. Numerous
studies of the potentials associated with
processing stimuli point to an unusual asymmetry of development, with
delays or impairment often located on the right
side. These differences, evident in change-detection, delay-
and stop-tasks are often observed in fMRI
studies and highlight potential contributions from inferior frontal
and cingulate function to the difficulties of ADHD subjects.
b)
Neuroimaging and the monoamines. The presumed
action of methylphenidate on the dopamine
transporter and well-publicised but controversial genetic evidence for
biased transmission of a transporter polymorphism seem to be supported
by PET studies reporting reduced binding
potentials in the midbrain and right ventral striatum. However, in addition,
there is not only evidence for altered mesocortical dopamine transmission
via the D4 binding site, but that noradrenergic
neurons (that are equally affected by methylphenidate and take up extrasynaptic
dopamine) contribute to anomalous cortical function. It is difficult
to overlook that alpha-2 agonism reduces distractibility, hyperactivity
and enhances associative learning, behavioural inhibition, and impulse
control. But there is also good experimental and some genetic evidence
for a relevant role of serotonin activity
in controlling cognitive impulsivity.
c)
Intra-individual variability and neuron-glia energy
supply. Could the characteristics and symptoms
of ADHD - rated as presenting often, frequently, pretty much, most of
the time – reflect a rather different type of disturbance? The
variability of expression and performance over brief time periods (milliseconds
to seconds) may be a core problem. Russell and colleagues (Russell
VA, Oades RD, Tannock R. et al. (2006) Behavioural and Brain Functions,
in press) propose an explanation. They
suggest that there is a deficiency of the energy supply to rapidly firing
cortical neurons. Central to the mechanism may be the lactate shuttle
under astrocytic control and modulated by monoaminergic input. If confirmed
the relevant mechanisms offer a whole range of new targets for genetic
moderation and therapeutic intervention.
|
|